This is an unusual horror franchise in that it never really took off. The original is a bonafide classic of extreme, gritty frantic madness. From there, it went in all kinds of sporadic directions never really settling into a consistent style. The first sequel ventured off into quirkiness, and the later sequel disregarded continuity entirely creating what is considered one of the worst films you could ever fear to endure. This entry was a little more stable in line with slashers of the era as it came from New Line Cinema. They honestly had a good approach that would make the franchise accessible to the general horror masses, but not laying back on the blood letting. However, this was the age where the MPAA was striking back at gory horror, and hacking and slashing the films down to extremely tame levels. The volume and style of violence in this film is comparable to any gory horror film of the last decade., but in 1989, this was threatened with an X rating (prior to the introduction of the NC-17 rating). Goes to show just how inconsistent the MPAA has been over the decades.
It has been several years since Leatherface last terrorized the Texan backwoods with his Sawyer family, but that doesn’t mean he hasn’t continued his cannibalistic ways. In fact, Leatherface has been “adopted” into a brand new family of crazed Texan cannibals. The film begins with an effective scene of Bubba “Leatherface” Sawyer (R.A. Mihailoff) sewing together a fresh mask of flesh while one of his victims attempts to escape, but gets gutted with a chain saw instead. From then on, we follow the eventful journey of siblings Ryan & Michelle (William Butler & Kate Hodge) as they drive from California to Florida to deliver a car to their father, but they’ve just entered into the desolate Texas landscape. As they drive into the night, Texas state authorities are cleaning up a hazardous mess of bodies which have decomposed into toxic material – remnants of past Sawyer family massacres. The brother and sister pairing drive into the next day and a gas station where they encounter a hitchhiking cowboy named Tex (Viggo Mortensen, The Prophecy, The Lord of the Rings) and the wild-eyed store owner Alfredo (Tom Everett). Tex gets friendly with Michelle and Ryan, to a lesser degree, but the cordial moment is cut short when Alfredo pulls a shotgun on the threesome, and the siblings haul ass out of there, watching Fredo blast away at them and Tex. The two siblings quickly take off down a deserted road, but soon find themselves stalked by Leatherface and his new cannibalistic and homicidal family. Ultimately, their only hope for escape is in Benny (Ken Foree), a survivalist who not only has the firepower, but also the training to take down the entire psychotic family.
To start off, this was a very troubled production. I can’t even begin to list the ways, but let’s just say that the film was so excessively violent that the repeated runs through the MPAA forced the release date to be delayed from early November, 1989 to January, 1990. At one time, director Jeff Burr was fired on Friday and re-hired on Monday. The shooting schedule was rushed, and the budget was tight. Also, I would have to say that calling this a “massacre” is false advertising as only two people outside of Leatherface’s adoptive family are killed in this film. There’s a lot of violence, but not a lot of death. Although, despite all this, Leatherface: Texas Chainsaw Massacre III is quite a good film.
The cast is solid, very solid. There are no amateurs here like in many slasher films. R.A. Mihailoff was an experienced stuntman at the time, and did a great job as a slightly more evolved Leatherface that is more focused in his mayhem than before, but still remains very youthful in mind and impulsive in action. He was also one strong dude having to lug that HUGE 80 lbs chain saw around almost everyday. William Butler had some previous experience in slasher flicks, but this was his most featured role and he does well in it. As Ryan, he’s a bit pensive and uneasy trying to deal with heavy situations. Of course, Viggo Mortensen delivers an entertaining and intriguing performance as the crazed Tex with a bit of an odd cross-dressing undertone. He pulls off the insanity and the charm very well, and proves to be a solid and impressive actor more than a decade before The Lord of the Rings made him a household name. Viggo was a great actor that existed under the radar for a long time before that big break, and even this early on, you can see his quality and versatility. Tom Everett really fits perfectly as the wild-eyed, fidgety, and probably schizophrenic Alfredo. Definitely a classic character for these films. Dawn of the Dead alumnus Ken Foree brings a lot of energy and a decent amount of humor to the role of Benny. He truly endears himself as the hero of the film whereas there are usually only perilous heroines. Benny gets to kick some ass, and really give our psychotic villains someone to tangle with. Also, with the character being an armed survivalist, we get some nice action scenes and fiery moments. Definitely a worthwhile and enjoyable character. Finally, there’s the female lead in Kate Hodge. She really rates high as Michelle among the other female leads of the series who go through maddening events and experiences, but this time, she doesn’t breakdown into a traumatized pile of emotional goo – so to speak. Michelle comes out as a far tougher character, and proves that she might not only survive, but also endure in the aftermath of this Texas Chainsaw Massacre.
KNB EFX have been an industry leader in special make-up effects for a long time, and this is another excellent example of why. The MPAA would not have so much an issue with the gore level if Kurtzman, Nicotero, and Berger weren’t so amazingly good at their jobs. Everything has such detail and texture to really drive home the squirming realism of the graphic violence and trauma that characters are put through. While the film itself might not be very highly regarded, the effects work here should be given high praise and special notoriety.
Cinematographer James L. Carter gives the film a very strong look. Personally, I see a resemblance in the visual tone of this film and Jason Goes To Hell, despite having different cinematographers. Both films have a very dark, dense landscape at night with a tinge of blue that makes these two films look very similar. It adds a more grounded, hardened look to the filmed imagery. The filmmakers wanted this to have a real horror feel, and maintained a gritty look throughout that really enhances the horror aspects entirely.
I believe Jeff Burr did a fine quality job despite the turbulence of production. He crafted a film that probably shouldn’t have turned out nearly as good as it did. The screenplay was well-written by David J. Schow in his first break. While he had been writing material for a long while, this was the first script of his to get produced. Although, he hasn’t had a wondrous career with a couple of Critters films, an episode of The Outer Limits, and two episodes of Ridley & Tony Scott produced anthology series The Hunger under his belt, but he did deliver us the screenplay to the cult classic The Crow. So, he is highly capable of delivering brilliant work, but hasn’t had the rich opportunities to demonstrate that much. All in all, he did a good job here with probably the only consistently worthwhile TCM sequel.
I’m not giving this a great endorsement because it is almost perfectly formulaic for a Texas Chain Saw Massacre film, but it’s the characters where this movie holds strong. The story is mostly a direct template from the first film, but the characters are more original than the story. There’s also more suspenseful and intense action than before or since. Also, I like this design of Leatherface the best, and who can resist the massive chain saw given to him with the phrase “The Saw is Family” engraved on the side? Mihailoff’s representation of old Bubba Sawyer has a lot more aggression and coordination than before. Kate Hodge brings a much stronger and tougher heroine to the series, and I can’t help but enjoy every role I see Viggo Mortensen in. Plus, there is an entertainment factor here beyond the terror, but it never overwhelms or damages the integrity of the horror elements. So, I do recommend this film to anyone looking for a hardcore slasher film with a healthy dose of gore and action. The DVD that’s been available for a long while has both the theatrical R-rated and full unrated cut of the movie. It’s always been nice how New Line Cinema was generally comprehensive about those things, but any true horror fan would likely never mind the censored version, anyway. Considering the sporadic quality of this franchise, I feel this entry is among the most accessible, sensical, and satisfying of them all. As for the remake and prequel? I do have reviews for them, but I’m saving them up for the September / October Halloween season. A long way to go, but I’m definitely saving the meatiest horror reviews for that part of the year.
I will start this review out saying that I am a fan of Rob Zombie, the musician. I was interested in Rob Zombie as a filmmaker due to the immense controversy surrounding his first film House of 1000 Corpses, but once I got to see it, theatrically, I found it to be a rather unexciting, very unoriginal, and highly derivative movie. It just seemed like one ninety minute long Rob Zombie music video. The only thing that made me see it a second time was Sid Haig’s incredible charisma and dark, dark humor as Captain Spaulding. It cracked me up like few things do, but other than that, the film held little interest for me. Others felt differently, but I will get more into such things as I have many of the same gripes here as I did with Zombie’s first film.
Picking up six months after the events of House of 1000 Corpses, The Ruggsville County Sheriff’s Department, headed by John Quincy Wydell (William Forsythe), is storming the Firefly household, and some do not survive. Mother Firefly is captured, but Otis & Baby escape to meet up with the foul-mouthed mad clown Captain Spaulding (who is also Baby’s father). Along their twisted road trip, they encounter some strange folk, and leave them worse off than they found them….much, much worse. Sheriff Wydell, in the meantime, is deadset on bringing the entire clan down because they killed his brother George (as seen in House of 1000 Corpses). Sheriff John Wydell has nothing but vengeance on his mind, but in time, that will drive him to become exactly what he’s hunting. The trio’s road trip takes many bizarre twists and turns, leaving unresolved plot points along the way, and ultimately leads the film to a strange and unsatisfying ending.
First and foremost, this is one grizzly, brutal, and unrestrained movie. I rented the unrated director’s cut, and so, everything that was meant to be seen, was seen. And while all the gory effects are excellent, and the performances are amazing, this film just doesn’t deliver anything more. The story is far too simple to justify all the over bloated crap that flows through it, and the resolution is horrendously weak. It feels like the work of an untalented novice filmmaker who just does things because he thinks they are cool instead of crafting a tight, coherent, and straight forward feature. Possibly the film’s strongest, more poignant character is dispatched like a worthless camper in a Friday The 13th movie. The death has no meaning, no importance when this character probably should not have died at all. It simply goes to show that despite Rob Zombie’s ability to make an intense and disturbing film, he really has a long way to go in crafting solid storytelling skills. He tries, but he fails for two films in a row.
I think it’s even worse in this one because some characters and plot points simply drop off the map with no reason, no explanation. Plot points about the Groucho Marx’ aliases is dropped after two scenes, and was apparently only created for a weak comedic bit. As for vanishing characters, Zombie apparently decides that once they’ve served their purpose, they should vanish entirely with no reason or resolution. It is a shame because there is such a great cast to work with such as Michael Berryman, Danny Trejo, Ken Foree, and the absolutely awesome William Forsythe. I was also rocked to see former WCW & WWE superstar “Diamond” Dallas Page featured as black-haired bounty hunter teamed with Trejo. Page does a fine job too, and having cameos from The Warrior‘s Deborah Van Valkenburg and Halloween‘s P.J. Soles was a unique touch. However, despite having such a rich cast, the story just does not offer up anything substantive for them to do anything with. There’s no ambition to do anything original with this concept which has been well treaded over the decades. We’ve seen movies with murder sprees before, and despite the extreme distance this one takes the violence and mayhem, such thrills are only momentary. Once the mayhem and gore is off screen, there’s not much to excite an audience or the film. The story is just three sick and twisted people on a killing spree running from the law and a vengeful lawman, period. Most films of this sort have some social commentary to offer amongst its grisly brutality. However, Zombie tries to throw all this frivolous, extraneous junk into it for his own amusement instead.
I can respect Rob Zombie for wanting to revitalize a forgotten genre of film, but by this time, it had already gotten back on its feet with numerous hardcore, edge-of-your-seat horror films that pushed the limits of disturbing imagery. Zombie churning out all these homage’s to 1970s exploitation films forces his films to be unoriginal and thin on story. It’s cool to give nods to your favorite films in your own feature, but only when done with the right skill and intellect. Otherwise, your film becomes blatantly derivative, watering it down to very weak levels. In fact, the entire premise is lifted directly from Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2, but Zombie doesn’t do enough to make The Devil’s Rejects seem original to even the smallest degree. Plus, the main characters that carryover from House of 1000 Corpses only make themselves even more detestable and inhuman. It’s obvious that Zombie is trying to make them into some twisted band of anti-heroes, but frankly, these characters are not relatable, let alone sympathetic creatures – they’re sick, twisted, homicidal psychopaths. Why anyone would root for these demented maniacs is beyond me, let alone why Zombie believes anyone would want to. They have zero endearing qualities.
Now, the style of this film isn’t as oversaturated or surreal as House of 1000 Corpses, but Rob Zombie clearly needed more competent help in the editing department. The pacing and editing of certain sequences is all out of whack, and very inconsistent. The final scene of the film drags on and on and on and on to the point where it loses all impact. The use of Lynyrd Skynyrd’s “Freebird” makes it quite the quirky and over-the-top sequence, but ultimately, this is a flat end to a film that seemed to have potential from time-to-time. Zombie’s attempt to make the murderous threesome go out in an amazing blaze of glory works against the entire film as these three deserve the harshest death possible for the horrific crimes they’ve committed. Instead, Zombie seems to want us to feel sorry that they’ve met their collective ends. The actual hero of the film gets a piss poor demise while the despicable villains get a grand, epic swan song. That’s a perfect example of what’s wrong with this movie.
The moral compass of the film’s perspective is entirely flipped. Otis, Spaulding, & Baby are given the breadth of screentime so that their characters can be developed in depth. The hero in William Forsythe’s Sheriff John Quincey Wydell is a strong character that could carry the film entirely, but he’s not the one the movie wants us to be invested in. By the fact of how the film treats their final moments, it is clear that the Firefly gang are meant to be the central focus of the entire story, and are the ones you should be emotionally connected with. While audiences have been able to be entertained and intrigued by vile characters before like Hannibal Lecter, Khan Noonien Singh, and Freddy Krueger, you never want to see them ultimately defeat their adversaries, the heroes of the story. They should get what’s coming to them for the violence they have wrought upon the innocent. This film doesn’t share that moral viewpoint, and decides to side with the detestable, sadistic murderers. That doesn’t roll for me. If the film had some thematic element about society’s corrupted morality fueling the characters’ demented psychology, it would be justifiable, but as it is, it’s completely ass-backwards.
On a highly positive note, the make-up effects of The Devil’s Rejects give the film its grisly texture, and for some, might make it a difficult watch. Zombie made a specific point to not make this film pretty – it is definitely grounded in that 70s ugliness. Even the nudity is dirty and trashy. Some CGI work is here, but only for certain gunshots and other minor details. Nothing here looks fake, it all has a dense, gritty realism to it, and that is a refreshing plus.
Unfortunately, whatever score there is happens to be practically unnoticeable. Zombie packs this film with classic rock songs from the Allman Brothers, Lynyrd Skynyrd, Joe Walsh, and so forth. It’s a much more era-appropriate soundtrack than the modern day heaviness of the previous film. The Devil’s Rejects soundtrack is probably quite a cool listen. Still, I would’ve preferred a stronger score to intensify the film further than using songs to remind people of the time period or using them to create quirky moments. I understand Rob Zombie comes from a music video world where he uses music to tell a story, but in the medium of feature films, music is used to enhance the story. It’s just one element of the overall structure of a movie. It punctuates particular moments in the story instead of bludgeoning you with an oversaturated soundtrack. Zombie really needs to adapt to the demands and standards of films instead of treating everything like a music video. House of 1000 Corpses was more guilty of that mentality with how everything was shot, lit, paced, and presented, but even though everything is more stripped down here, that mentality is still apparent.
When taking this film in as a whole, it’s really not much better than Rob Zombie’s feature film directorial debut, House of 1000 Corpses. While that film was more a true horror film in the sense that it was meant to scare and horrify you, this film just tries to freak you out through disturbing violence and sickening moments. It maybe darker and sicker, but it’s not really all that much better. I would’ve expected more of an improvement from Zombie, but I suppose a great deal more time would be needed for him to evolve as a filmmaker. However, for me, two strikes against him was enough for my interest to fully evaporate. Once I heard he was remaking Halloween, a great film from one of my favorite filmmakers as well as the review of mine that motivated me to create Forever Cinematic, I just couldn’t care anymore. Rob Zombie had great resources to work with in every aspect of filmmaking, but he couldn’t utilize it all to its highest potential. Frankly, I don’t recommend seeing or not seeing The Devil’s Rejects, I’m just rather indifferent. Just don’t expect anything all that original if you do plan to see it. If you liked House of 1000 Corpses, you’ll probably enjoy this film. If you hated House of 1000 Corpses, you probably won’t like this film either.